Markets · The Setup Scan
The Setup Scan
Every session, the engine runs the whole Nifty 500 through a brutal AND-gate: the chart and the filed numbers must both qualify, the volume tape must agree, and one red flag kills the tag. Search any name for its scored, dated analysis and the official filing behind it.
The scan
The Setup Scan runs the full Nifty 500 through a dual-axis engine after every session: a technical setup AND a filed-fundamentals setup must BOTH clear their floors, the volume tape must not be in distribution, valuation is judged relative to sector and the stock's own history, and one red flag kills the tag. As of the 2026-07-16 close, 57 of 486 scanned names hold a near-perfect setup and 115 more sit on the watchlist; the top read is AADHARHFC at 100 out of 100.
BazaarBaaziSource & method
Search the scanned universeClose 2026-07-16
Type any symbol or company, pick a sector from the dropdown, or walk the tiers. Every name opens its full engine read: the scores, the reasons, the red flags, the filed quarter behind it, and the exact date the analysis is current to.
57 of 486 scanned names · every read current to the 2026-07-16 close
How the engine judges a setupThe method
Most screens answer one question: is the chart good, or are the numbers good. This scan refuses to answer either alone. A name earns the near-perfect tag only when a technical setup and a fundamental setup BOTH clear their floors on the same day. Pure price screens flag roughly four traps in ten, a clean breakout on rotting earnings, and pure ratio screens buy value that the tape is busy distributing. The AND-gate is the whole point: 57 names out of 486 is a verdict on the market, not a filter setting.
The technical axis reads structure the way a positional desk does: stage-two uptrends, pullbacks to a rising moving average, fresh golden crosses, tightening ranges under accumulation, relative strength against NIFTY. The fundamental axis reads only official NSE-XBRL filings, paisa-exact, summed to trailing-twelve-month figures before any ratio math: earnings acceleration, margin quality, revenue delivery, and a result score on the freshest filed quarter. India is structurally expensive, so value is never an absolute P/E cutoff; it is judged relative to the sector median and the stock's own fifteen-month band, with a reverse-DCF check that the growth being delivered is not already over-priced.
Then the tape gets a veto. Chaikin money flow, the up-day versus down-day volume ratio, MFI and accumulation-distribution days roll into a money-flow score, and heavy distribution kills a tag no matter how pretty the chart. Red flags do the same on the other axis: shrinking profits, a deteriorating filing, no clean price history. What survives is short, dated, and fully reasoned, and the engine prints its entry, stop and target frame so you can disagree with it precisely.
Everything here is deterministic rule code over real data. The same inputs produce the same scan, every reason traces to a price series or an official filing, and every card carries the date its analysis is current to. When the scan is wrong, it is wrong in the open, which is exactly how the desk wants it.
FAQ6 reader questions · AEO-eligible
The editorial line, distilled. Schema-marked for AI Overview and reader search.
What makes a setup near-perfect?
Five gates, all mandatory: a qualifying technical setup (structure, not just momentum), a qualifying fundamental setup from official filed numbers, a money-flow read that is not in distribution, valuation no worse than fair relative to the sector and the stock's own 15-month band, and zero red flags. Miss any one gate and the best a name can earn is the watchlist.
Why do only 57 names qualify out of 500?
Because the bar is an AND-gate, not a weighted average. A clean chart on rotten earnings fails; great earnings under distribution fails; both axes on a rich valuation fails. The count itself is a market read: it expands when leadership is broad and healthy, and shrinks when the tape narrows. A small number is information, not a bug.
What is the Setup Score?
A 0 to 100 composite the engine prints per name: the best setup on each axis plus a small confluence bonus when multiple setups fire together, with a money-flow boost when the volume tape confirms. It is deterministic rule code over real data, versioned and repeatable, which is why every card can show its reasons instead of asking you to trust a black box.
Where do the fundamentals come from?
Official NSE-XBRL filings, paisa-exact, ingested by the BazaarBaazi earnings lab. Never scraped third-party ratios. Filed EPS is quarterly, so the engine sums the trailing four quarters into a TTM figure before any valuation math (feeding a quarterly EPS into a P/E is roughly four times wrong). Every card links the official filing it read.
How fresh is each analysis?
Every card prints the exact close its analysis is current to, currently 2026-07-16. The scan refreshes on the desk's nightly run after each trading session. If a scan is ever delayed, the date on the card says so plainly; a read here is never silently stale.
Is a near-perfect tag a buy recommendation?
No. It is a transparent, deterministic screen over real price structure and official filings, with every reason and its source on the card. It is editorial framing and a research starting point, not SEBI-registered investment advice. The engine even prints its risk frame so you can disagree with it precisely.
Go deeper
Hub
The market board
Indices and marquee names, color-graded across timeframes
Screener
The signed-reads screener
Filter the covered set by desk stance, Crack Score and Event Heat
Stocks
Signed stock views
Every covered name's full verdict
Earnings
The earnings desk
Official filed results, season-wide
Brief
The market brief
The dated record of every session