BazaarBaazi

BazaarBaazi · Editorial

AI Disclosure

Where AI sits in the BazaarBaazi newsroom, what it does, what it does not, and how the human editor remains accountable for every byline.

Last updated


BazaarBaazi uses large language models in its production workflow. This page is a full disclosure of where, why, and under what controls. It is updated whenever the workflow changes.

Where AI is used

Where AI is not used

Models in current use

BazaarBaazi's AI workflow runs on Anthropic's Claude family of models (Opus and Sonnet at the time of writing) for editing, drafting, and headline rewriting; on a vision-capable model for image descriptions and alt-text; and on local LLM tooling for routine structured extraction. Models are reviewed quarterly and the active version is documented in the project's public technical record.

Audit trail

Every published story has a per-story log that records: the original brief, the first draft, the human-edited final, the timestamps of each edit, and the model versions used. The log is retained for two years and is available to readers on a per-story basis on request.

Why this matters

AI-assisted journalism becomes irresponsible when it removes the human editor of record. BazaarBaazi's commitment is the opposite: AI takes the boring parts of the job (extraction, formatting, first-draft prose) and frees the human editor to do the work that only a human can do well. That is, deciding what runs, what the verdict is, who to call before publish, and what to retract when we get it wrong.

Reader feedback on AI use

If a reader believes a published story shows signs of poor AI oversight (factual errors, generic phrasing that contradicts the named author's usual voice, sources that do not check out), they are encouraged to flag it via [email protected]. Such reports are treated as priority correction requests.